WE DONāT NEED STEVE BANNON TO TELL US WHAT WE ALREADY
KNOW ABOUT DONALD TRUMP
The urgent need for clarity in Trump era has generally been met instead with euphemism and hyperbole, but in this case a little bit of both is instructive.
On Wednesday, NewYork magazine published explosive excerpts from a new Trump-administration tell-all by one-time contributor Michael Wolff, sourced largely to the presidentās erstwhile adviser and propagandist Steve Bannon.
The ongoing fallout has seen President Trump issue a deranged statement to the press corps accusing Bannon of having lost his mind, and Trumpās Press Secretary Sarah Sanders field questions about whether Trumpās campaign (including his son and son-in-law) behaved in ātreasonousā fashion, as Bannon now alleges. The White House has sought to dismiss much of this new reporting as malicious gossip, and some of Wolffās competitors and critics have played along, not unreasonably, by dredging up unflattering magazine profiles that reveal him to have been an unreliable narrator.
Yet neither Trump, nor Wolffās critics, have anything to say about the factāapparent to allāthat Wolffās forthcoming book is sourced to the very same cast of Trump-world liars and moral reprobates whose claims have appeared in the political press every day for over a year. In that time, Trump has raged against unflattering news, true and false, including stories his own confidantes leaked for their own ends to hungry reporters in a kind of mutually destructive parasitism that has left all parties horribly damaged. Wolffās book brings things to a salacious new peak, but the basic dynamic is the same. The main difference now is that the people getting hurt are the ones who normally run to the press trying to hurt other people.
One of Bannonās former subordinates, Ben Shapiro, likes to say that Bannonās āpriorityā has always been ānarrative truthā¦rather than factual truth.ā This is a delicate way of saying Bannon is a propagandist, always tugging at his audienceās sense of what is emotionally correct in their hearts, rather than what is empirically accurate. But it is a useful euphemism for the purposes of discussing Wolffās book because it captures the karmic nature of this new reporting so perfectly: An unreliable reporter and a propagandist have sent Trump world into a state of upheaval by harnessing the power of ānarrative truthā and turning it inward.
Letās begin with some of Wolffās farthest-fetched, most plausibly erroneous reporting in the excerpt.
- Wolff quotes Trumpās former deputy chief of staff, Katie Walsh, describing her efforts to serve the president as ālike trying to figure out what a child wants.ā In response, she textedmultiple reporters to disclaim the quote.
- Wolff recreates dialogue between Trump and Rupert Murdoch that ends with Murdoch hanging up the phone and calling Trump a āfucking idiot.ā
- Wolff asserts that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump privately agreed that between the two of them, should the opportunity to rise, she, not he, would be the one to run for president.
- In a portion of the book not excerpted by New York, Wolff quotes Bannon speculating that Trumpās son inculpated his father in collusion with Russians. āThe chance that Don Jr did not walk these jumos up to his fatherās office on the twenty-sixth floor is zero.ā
Is Wolff right? Did these things happen? Can they be proven? Maybe! They certainly werenāt reported in a way that surprised his main source.
In case anyone thought this was some sort of mishap. pic.twitter.com/zyzsjSwx4dā Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) January 3, 2018
For Bannonās purposes, though, what matters is that they feel right to his intended readers. Whether or not Katie Walsh said what Wolff quotes her saying, or Murdoch called Trump a āfucking idiot,ā itās almost certainly true that Walsh and Murdoch think Trump is a fucking idiot, because everyone who knows Trump thinks he is a fucking idiot. Trumpās secretary of state has repeatedly refused to deny calling the president a āfucking moronā in front of multiple administration principals, after they leaked his comments to the press. Republicans all over Washington say similar things about Trump whenever they feel like unburdening themselves to or currying favor with reporters off the record.
Jared and Ivanka may or may not harbor their own delusions of presidential grandeur, but they are precisely the kind of arrogant, entitled brats, oblivious to their own collective mediocrity, who would think out loud this way, in the midst of her fatherās disastrous presidency. The White House rejects Bannonās assertion that Donald Trump, Jr. introduced his father to Russian spies in Trump tower in June 2016, and it may not be true, but the imputationāthat Trump was well apprised of the campaignās relationship with Russian election saboteursāis at this point impossible for honest people to deny.
The White House canāt plausibly dispel the plot points in Wolffās book, because the White House knows that, wherever the truth lies, his stories are more believable than their denials. Bannon laundered a confessional through a New York-media reporter for the same reason he laundered Clinton Cash reporting through the New York Times, while using his own website, Breitbart, for the distinct purpose of whipping up racial panic among people interested in completely different narrative truths. Wolff spins a yarn, but has more credibility in elite circles than Breitbart or than Bannon himself. And whether Wolff did his due diligence or not, the political reporters who spent the past year writing comparably salacious palace-intrigue stories have little standing to say his anonymous sources arenāt to be believed. Better reporters wouldnāt have published this stuff, nobody wouldāve believed it if it appeared in red-meat form on Breitbart.
Wolffās reporting tantalizes. Like so much other reporting on these shameless liars, though, it convinces us to believe things that arenāt true, without teaching us anything we donāt, at some level, already know. In that sense itās a testament to the success Bannon and the Trumpers have had degrading not just conservative politics, but the entire political culture. Itās only small solace that the liars are now in open warfare with each other.
via: crooked
Comments
Post a Comment